Nirvana In Utero
  Full ReviewUser Ratings (825)
Tracklist:
1. Serve the Servants
2. Scentless Apprentice
3. Heart Shaped Box
4. Rape Me
5. Frances Farmer Will Have Her Revenge on Seattle
6. Dumb
7. Very Ape
8. Milk It
9. Pennyroyal Tea
10. Radio Friendly Unit Shifter
11. Tourette's
12. All Apologies
13. Gallons Of Rubbing Alcohol Flow Through The Strip

Ranking: #27 for 1993

You Say:
4
excellent


User Rating Distribution:
Chart.
On 68 Lists

Members Also Liked:

Pink Floyd - Dark Side of the Moon
Led Zeppelin - Led Zeppelin IV
Pearl Jam - Ten
Pink Floyd - Wish You Were Here
Pink Floyd - The Wall
Queens Of The Stone Age - Songs For The Deaf
Led Zeppelin - Led Zeppelin II
Smashing Pumpkins - Mellon Collie and the Infinite Sadness
2
poor
asheroth (9 Reviews)

2005-10-20 | 42 comments | 1,991 views
Other Reviews: mranti (5), The Hypnotist (5), mybrotherthecow (4.5), Andrew Hartwig Staff (4), KoRn fReeK Staff (4), Adam Downer Staff (3), Josh Bowers (3),

2 of 3 thought this review was well written

The other reviews of this have well and truly covered the backstory of this band and the album, so I won’t spend too much time on it.

Everyone knows the story behind In Utero – how it was the true expression of Kurt Cobain’s musical genius and how the bend felt that they had to make an album that turned out exactly how they wanted, after being forced to conform with Nevermind. This album has been widely hailed as one of the finest grunge efforts in the history of the genre. So naturally, when I saw it for AUD$10, I had to pick it up. I wasn’t even a huge fan of Nirvana – it was just one of those albums that you should own.

Unfortunately, and surprisingly, In Utero failed to impress.

Yes, it’s raw. Steve Albini certainly did his job on the production side of things. Novoselic’s bass thunders unashamedly through the mix, Dave Grohl is the manic skinbasher with no concept of dynamics other than ‘louder’, and Kurt Cobain’s fuzzy yet somehow penetrating guitar tone covers everything whether it’s making musical sense or not. While the production values are one of the album’s finest points to many people, to me they’re off-putting. Being raw is all very well and good, but in this case it actually makes the music painful to listen to.

Kurt Cobain in his capacity as singer/guitarist doesn’t do a lot to alleviate this. The man obviously knows how he wants to represent his musical ideas. In that regard the album is near-perfect. But the problem remains that Cobain’s voice is aggravating, his guitar playing is sloppy and his tone undefined. This is, of course, precisely how Cobain wanted the album to turn out. It’s not his songwriting that’s at fault – the sound of the album simply fails to sound good to me.

And so we come to the tired, overworked ground of Cobain’s lyrics. There’s some gems in here – ‘I miss the comfort in being sad’ is one, as is ‘Teenage angst has paid off well, now I’m bored and old.’ However, Cobain’s few moments of blunt but strangely evocative lyrical insight are more than outweighed by the spectacular duds contained in the album. Lowlights include ‘Like most babies smell like butter, his smell smelled like no other’, and the monstrously bad ‘What else should I say/Everyone is gay.’ Laughs courtesy of All Apologies.

Despite the musical box that Nirvana had worked themselves into with this album, there are a few tracks that manage to cut through the mess of noise. Serve the Servants is a promising opening, sporting a groove that is missing from most of the rest of the album. Cobain delivers a fine vocal performance, venturing into the lower part of his range in the chorus, and (gasp) produces a solo commendable for both its chaos and unlikely melody. Dumb is worth a mention just for the understated cello line floating below Cobain’s simple yet effective guitar line. Heart Shaped Box is one of my favourites, and one of the only times where the messy production comes off well. Pennyroyal Tea is a surprisingly effective contrast of soft, laid-back melody and distorted guitars into which Cobain’s strained yells blend nicely. Overall, Nirvana’s softer, more reflective moments are their best, as the loud and in-your-face songs suffer from a complete lack of melody and seem to be almost trying too hard – ironic, as Cobain wasn’t trying to please anyone with this record.

I guess the point is that Kurt Cobain is welcome to express himself however he likes, and use whatever sound he deems best to do so, but he should not expect me to accept it as listenable music. And of course, he doesn’t – Cobain always expected this record to fail commercially. That’s ironic, or something. Nirvana did In Utero for themselves, and I’m happy to leave it with them. So kudos to Nirvana for coming up with an album that expressed their musical and emotion position rather well, but this time I’ll pass, thanks.

Email this Review to a Friend

More Nirvana Reviews
Bleach

Incesticide

MTV Unplugged in New York

Nevermind

Recent reviews by this author
Pain Of Salvation Scarsick
Pelican The Fire in Our Throats Will Beckon...
Live Birds Of Pray
Becoming the Archetype Terminate Damnation
Deadsoul Tribe The January Tree
Isis Panopticon

Page 1 of 2 | Next > | >>
Neoteric
Staff Reviewer


Comments: 3231
10.20.05


Though I respect your opinion, I disagree. It was a good review though.

Digging: John Wiese - Soft Punk

Auldy


Comments: 286
10.20.05

Album Rating: 4

MusicOfficial101 posted a new review for this album, like yesterday man

Auldy


Comments: 286
10.20.05

Album Rating: 4

and i disagree with you a bit too here...."In Utero fails to impress" tisk tisk

decent review though

Neoteric
Staff Reviewer


Comments: 3231
10.20.05


I thought In Utero was brilliant.

Electric City
Staff Reviewer


Comments: 7477
10.20.05

Album Rating: 4

Didn't I just see this somewhere? I swear I did...

Digging: City Of Caterpillar - City Of Caterpillar

Kid A


Comments: 261
10.20.05

Album Rating: 1

^^^what he said.


Digging: Sky Eats Airplane - Everything Perfect on the Wrong Day

marcman


Comments: 2
10.20.05

Album Rating: 5

I agree with what hobo head said. Great reveiw mate =)

Neoteric
Staff Reviewer


Comments: 3231
10.20.05


Quote:
^^^What this guy thinks
What that guy doesn't think.

Electric City
Staff Reviewer


Comments: 7477
10.20.05

Album Rating: 4

Who's thinking? Who's talking? Why did this guy do a review for this when there was one 2 days ago? what the **** is going on?

Neoteric
Staff Reviewer


Comments: 3231
10.20.05


I myself do not know.

Trampalicious


Comments: 36
10.20.05

Album Rating: 1.5

Basically this is a bad album.

pulseczar


Comments: 2387
10.20.05

Album Rating: 3.5

best nirvana album!!!!!!

Digging: Army of the Pharaohs - The Torture Papers

Electric City
Staff Reviewer


Comments: 7477
10.20.05

Album Rating: 4

I never heard Bleach, but this is my least favorties out of everything mainstream.

Trampalicious


Comments: 36
10.20.05

Album Rating: 1.5

Neither have I, I lost Nirvana, I just find them boring and depressing and I don't think anymore Nirvana will help me.
Some say Bleach is their best but I only got into Nirvana because of Dave Grohl and he's not on that album.

masada


Comments: 2735
10.20.05


Good review, maaaaaaan.

I'm probably going to write a review for Nevermind sometime soon.

Kid A


Comments: 261
10.20.05

Album Rating: 1

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cathedral
What that guy doesn't think.


I do too!


*infinite sadness* X Infinity.

asheroth


Comments: 130
10.21.05

Album Rating: 2

I've been wanting to write a review for this for a while because there weren't any negative opinions on it. I didn't know that MusicOfficial had just posted one. So that's why it's up here.

Also, if you liked the review, could you chuck a positive rating my way? Some Nirvana fanboy negged my review without explaining why.

Thanks for the lack of flaming, btw. This is, after all, only my opinion

Oh, and:

"and i disagree with you a bit too here...."In Utero fails to impress" tisk tisk"

What? How can you disagree with whether I was impressed or not?

This Message Edited On 10.21.05

mybrotherthecow


Comments: 79
04.01.06

Album Rating: 4

your rating is the most stupid ratong of this album. you may not like it but still it deserves a better rating then this because of the talent shown on it.

sj_2150


Comments: 251
04.01.06


Nirvana are not punk rock...

The Jungler
Staff Reviewer


Comments: 4819
04.01.06

Album Rating: 3.5

Grunge started out as punk. So it wouldn't really be wrong to call them punk rock.

Page 1 of 2 | Next > | >>


You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





FAQ / site forum / staff / contact us
Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
Site Copyright 2005-2008 Sputnikmusic.com  All Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors